Achieving and Maintaining Quality Performance
WHY IS QUALITY IMPORTANT FOR YOU?
Exactly what does quality mean in the context of advocacy, community development, health, or human service organizations or initiatives?
A quality program:
- Responds as effectively as possible to the needs it was designed to meet
- Is totally consistent with the mission and philosophy of the organization or group carrying it out
- Is sensitive to the needs and culture of the target population
- Is a model of ethical behavior
But why is quality important for a grass roots organization?
- Quality makes a group more effective at meeting the needs it’s concerned with
- Quality adds strength and credibility to your organization or initiative
- Ethically, you’re bound to provide the absolute best quality of service or advocacy you can
- Quality is always more economical in the long run
- Developing a “culture of quality” can have a number of positive effects on your organization itself
- If staff members and volunteers know that they and the organization are doing the best job possible, it builds their morale and makes them proud of themselves and the organization
- Striving for quality helps to develop organizational and individual competence, thus continually improving the organization
- A quality program continually increases its performance level and improves its service delivery, which gives your organization credibility and ultimately benefits your target audience
WHAT ARE THE BASIC PRINCIPLES OF TQM?
(Much of the following discussion is based on material contained in Introduction to Total Quality: Quality Management for Production, Processing, and Services, 2nd Edition. Full source citation can be found underResources.)
There are some basic assumptions that underlie the idea of TQM. In this section, we’ll look at how they might relate to your organization or initiative.
KEY ELEMENTS OF TOTAL QUALITY
- Customer Focus: Everything an organization does should have the needs of the customer as its starting point. In your work, the “customer” is the target population or the community that will benefit from what you are offering or doing. What are the needs to which you are responding? How can you meet those needs effectively, appropriately, and with respect for the people you’re intending to serve?
- Obsession with Quality: Quality has to be something that’s considered from the very beginning and built into everything a business or organization does. Planning carefully, monitoring your work, and constant reevaluation and adjustment are all extremely important. You don’t ensure quality by catching mistakes before they reach the customer; you ensure it by setting up a system in which you don’t make the mistakes to begin with. Everyone in the organization must understand and adopt this point of view if the organization is truly going to have quality performance.
- Continual Improvement of Systems: The work of an organization must be viewed as a process that is never finished. Any program can always be improved, and must be changed as the needs of the community or the target population change.
- Unity of Purpose: In order for quality to be achieved, everyone in an organization or business has to work together toward common goals. That means mutual support throughout the organization, not turf battles, not jealousy, not unnecessary competition. All interactions among people in the organization should be mutually helpful and aimed at achieving the best possible performance of the organization as a whole.
- Teamwork: Working in teams, rather than individually, people make better connections with their colleagues and the organization, and create better results. Teamwork removes performance pressure from the individual and usually coaxes better performance from everyone.
- Employee Involvement: If everyone in an organization is to be committed to quality performance, then all staff members should have the ability to contribute to its achievement. That means that people must have enough control over their own jobs to do them effectively, and that everyone’s opinions and ideas must be respected and taken seriously.
- Education and Training: Achieving quality requires constant learning for everyone in an organization, and that learning needs to be part of the organizational culture. Not only should staff members be learning from others in the organization, but they should also be encouraged to take courses, to attend organization-sponsored trainings and workshops, to visit other organizations, etc., to continually learn more about their work, and to get new ideas and perspectives on it.
- Scientific Approach: For grass roots and community-based organizations, this means using the best research available, as well as the experience of others, to construct an effective program or initiative. That approach is much more likely to result in success and high quality than relying only on intuition or on what seems politically correct.
The founders of a Massachusetts community-based adult literacy program, with backgrounds in both developmental psychology and reading theory, based their program on the best available research in both areas. They made sure that the educational and support elements of the program fit together properly, and trained staff with that in mind. Initially, since it was doing something that hadn’t been done with adults before, the program was severely criticized by others in the field. The founders were accused of cheating their students by not using a strict, phonics-based approach to reading, and by paying too much attention to other matters – students’ concerns, community issues, etc. As time went on, however, and the program’s drop-out rate remained extremely low and its students’ success rate extremely high, others began experimenting with similar ideas. 15 years later, the program is a model for the state, but it keeps changing, responding both to student needs and feedback and to new research findings.
- Long-Term Commitment: The best work in the world is ultimately useless if it’s not maintained. Quality is a long-term concept: you have to keep striving for its improvement, even after you’ve achieved an acceptable level of performance. “Acceptable” is never good enough. In fact, you’re never really at an endpoint, because the level you’re trying to reach is “the best that can possibly be.”
THE DEMING CYCLE
The assumptions above underlie the “Deming Cycle,” which is really a process for creating and selling a quality product. We’ll revisit the Deming Cycle later to examine how it can be used in an advocacy, community development, health, or human service context.
- Plan – conduct consumer research and use it for planning the product
- Do – produce the product
- Check – check the product to make sure it was produced in accordance with the plan
- Act – market the product
- Analyze – analyze how the product is received in the marketplace in terms of quality, cost, and other data
WHAT IS TQM AND ITS RELEVANCE TO YOUR ORGANIZATION?
It is important to note that the principles of TQM were designed for the business sector, so while some aspects are relevant to organizations concerned with advocacy, community development, health, and human services, other aspects may be contrary to the goals of those organizations.
Some elements of TQM that would work toward quality in any environment include:
- The need for careful planning, monitoring, evaluation, and adjustment
- Teamwork and the empowerment of all in the organization
- Constant education and training for all staff
- Attention to the needs of the target population and to the results for them
- Identifying and changing what doesn’t work well
- Encouraging and rewarding, rather than discouraging, new ideas
- Developing an organization-wide culture of quality
- Keeping at it over the long term
Some elements which may not work toward quality for your organization are those that assume that the goal is the success of a business, such as:
- The emphasis on products and production, which may take the focus off the human needs and consequences your organization is concerned with
- The assumption of a hierarchical structure where those in authority “let ” others have a say in the achievement of quality, and where leadership always comes from the top, which may conflict with the way your organization operates
- The definition of everyone as either a supplier or a consumer/customer, which may provide the wrong metaphors for grass roots work where everyone is, on some level, a participant
HOW DO YOU ACHIEVE QUALITY PERFORMANCE, USING TQM AND OTHER PRINCIPLES?
Using the Deming Cycle while keeping some of the basic TQM principles in mind can help you design, deliver, refine, and maintain an effective program or initiative.
Conduct consumer research and use it for planning the product. The “product” here is the actual program you intend to conduct, and the “consumer research” is an examination of actual needs of the target population, the community, and others who will be affected.
Thus, the “Plan” part of the cycle might include the following:
- Conducting a needs assessment, involving everyone concerned
- Deciding what the desirable outcomes are, from the perspectives of the target population, the organization, and the larger community
- Determining ways to reach those outcomes that are feasible, consistent with the guiding principles of the organization, inclusive (respectful of all and beneficial to as many people and groups as possible), and consistent with the needs and culture of the target population
- Developing indicators to show when you have reached either outcomes themselves or significant points on the way to reaching those outcomes
- Inviting all stakeholders to participate in the development of the plan
Produce the product. The “production” part of the process is the actual design of the program, outreach effort, treatment strategy, etc. that will meet the need determined in the “Plan” part of the cycle. Much of the actual work here depends not only on TQM principles (teamwork, employee involvement, scientific approach, obsession with quality, and customer focus), but also on common sense and organizing principles.
The following are important elements of designing an effective program:
- Finding out what has already been tried in the community, and how well it worked
- Discovering whether there’s any residual bad feeling attached to certain methods or approaches — or people — which may resurface if they’re proposed again
- Using as examples other communities that have successfully mounted similar programs, while remaining aware that not everything that works in one place will work in another
- Consulting the research to see what has worked in this situation
- Involving all stakeholders in the development of the program or initiative, especially the people who will do the actual work
- Taking care of the logistics: a place to operate, equipment and supplies, the proper staff and/or volunteers on board, etc.
Check the product to make sure it was produced in accordance with the plan. Compare the details and overall shape of the program or initiative to the plan. Does it align with the needs assessment? Does it look like it will address the desired outcomes in desired ways? Is it inclusive? Was everyone involved in its development? Is it feasible? Is it ready to go?
Market the product. “Marketing the product” here means actually running the program or initiative that you’ve planned.
If it’s going to work well, there are some non-TQM standards that need to be applied:
- Everyone involved should understand the process that led up to this program, as well as the philosophy, concept, and workings of it
- Everyone involved should be committed to making every effort to bring about success. A program or initiative should never fail because people don’t follow through or do their jobs. (This doesn’t mean that you shouldn’t expect mistakes; it means, rather, that mistakes shouldn’t happen just because people weren’t trying, or because they simply didn’t bother to do something they knew they had to do.)
- All the planning in the world is useless if everyone involved doesn’t go into the experience expecting to do their best, and if there aren’t good people implementing the functions of the organization
Analyze how the product is received in terms of quality, cost, and other data. Analysis in this context – looking at what you’re doing, evaluating it, and trying to improve it – needs to be conducted on the basis of the original plan, with discussions among participants, staff, and others.
- Does the program or initiative actually address the identified needs? Are these needs the same as when the original assessment was conducted?
- Does the program or initiative reach, or help participants reach, the desired outcomes? Were those outcomes the right ones to aim for, or do they need to be changed? (Looking at the indicators you’ve developed should help you answer both these questions.)
- Is the plan in fact feasible? Can the program or initiative be run with the time, resources, and personnel available? Is it accessible to participants? Are staff and volunteers able to do their jobs without having to work to exhaustion, or beyond reasonable expectations? Is the program or initiative accepted by the community and other organizations?
- Is the program or initiative consistent with the vision, mission, philosophy and guiding principles of the organization (and are those still the same as when the plan was formulated)? Does what actually goes on in the program or initiative — working conditions, empowerment, relations among staff, participants, volunteers, and the community — mirror its desired effect on the community and society?
- Is the program or initiative inclusive and respectful of the target population and the community?
- Is the program or initiative ethical? Are you skirting your own principles in any way? Are you ignoring basic principles of fairness, honesty, civility, democracy, or responsibility for your actions?
Although the two are usually congruent, ethical is not always exactly the same as legal. The exercise of civil disobedience may be profoundly ethical, while being, at the same time, inarguably illegal. The civil rights marches and actions led by Martin Luther King and others during the 1950′s and 60′s often fell into this category.
RESTART THE CYCLE
Your analysis should naturally lead into a new planning sessions, and where necessary, lead to rethinking and reworking the program or initiative, or even the task of the organization itself.
HOW DO YOU MAINTAIN QUALITY PERFORMANCE?
While the maintenance of quality is, to some extent, built into the Deming Cycle, it requires some particular commitments and action.
INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF DYNAMISM
An organization needs to be dynamic, always moving and always seeking continued improvement, and to institutionalize its dynamic character.
- An assumption of dynamism needs to be part of the organizational culture, with everyone understanding and buying into it.
- Encouraging and providing support — to staff, volunteers, and participants — for learning.
Organizational support for education includes providing, or coordinating with another organization’s provision of, professional development or university courses, training, certification, etc., that help staff and volunteers to build their skills. If financial resources are not available, other means of institutional support — release time or leave time, special recognition, a library for the organization, study circles or reading groups, etc. — need to be considered. Everyone in the organization, including administrators and Board members, should be encouraged to take advantage of learning opportunities and to model learning behavior.
- Listening to and carefully evaluating ideas from everyone.
- Encouraging openness to change and experimentation with new ideas and strategies
Administrators and Board members need to model such openness by being willing to reexamine and change procedures, policies, etc. when needed. Staff and volunteers should be given room to try out even things that others may be skeptical about, as long as they can justify the attempt (“It worked elsewhere” and “I learned about it in a course” are both reasonable justifications.). If such an attempt is honestly carried out, it should be seen as a positive even if it fails: it provided new information, and is another building block in the construction of a quality program.
- Never being complacent and always being open to the idea that the work could be done differently — and better.
- Incorporating constant reevaluation, including feedback and ideas from the target population.
- Always being aware of the original mission, but not being afraid of change. While the mission itself may change as the community and circumstances do, it should nonetheless remain consistent with the principles and philosophy upon which the organization was founded.
LONG-RANGE STRATEGIC PLANNING
To maintain quality, an organization needs to continually look at itself over and for the long term. It needs to ask some questions about its role and its future:
- Is it meeting an ongoing need effectively? If not, what does it need to do to become more effective?
- Have community needs changed? Are they likely to? If so, how can the organization regroup to meet new needs?
- Are there more or different things it should be doing? Does it need to expand its present activities to meet current or projected community needs?
- Does it need more resources, or will it in the future? What are some likely sources?
- Is its structure appropriate to what it’s doing, and consistent with its mission and guiding principles? (An organization dedicated to empowerment, for instance, may not be consistent if its internal structure is hierarchical and authoritarian.)
- Are its goals, vision, and philosophy still relevant to the realities of the community and in keeping with its organizational mission and guiding principles?
One way to explore these questions is through the use of another device partially borrowed from TQM: SWOT analysis. SWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. Each of the questions above can be examined in the light of SWOT analysis. What are the strengths and weaknesses of your organization in regard to each question? What opportunities exist for the organization in each area of its functioning? And what threats or challenges will the organization have to overcome if it is to continue to be successful, and to maintain quality performance?
Strengths and weaknesses:
Strengths and weaknesses may be trends, rather than specifics. A level of service that is currently appropriate, for example, is not a strength if it is more or less than will be needed in a year. A new program that’s not ready to implement yet is not a weakness if it’s unready because the developers are taking the time necessary to make it effective.
By the same token, strengths and weaknesses don’t necessarily lie only in the success of programs or the skills of staff members, but in such areas as relationships, contacts, and reputation. An organization running a great program may still be have serious weaknesses because it lacks some of these other features, no matter how well it carries out its day-to-day activities.
Opportunities can take many forms.
- An organization may be able to meet other needs with its current structure. For instance, an organization that publicizes and provides prenatal care to pregnant teens could be in an excellent position to also publicize and provide vaccinations, nutrition information, and help with parenting skills after the babies are born.
- It may be possible to expand into other areas of service, or into a larger arena (another town, another county, national instead of just one state).
- Increased funding may be available from new sources, or because of changed circumstances. A new census, for example, can result in an increase in federal funds to a region, or an economic downturn may bring a demand — and increased funding — for adult education or retraining.
- Collaboration with other groups, leading to increased resources, may become a prospect.
- Invitations or awards offered to your organization or staff members or good press may lead to your organization being viewed as more “legitimate.”
Taking advantage of any opportunity can have both positive and negative consequences for your organization, so it’s important to analyze the situation carefully before committing yourself.
Some of the challenges that go along with any opportunity can be truly daunting if they’re not thought through carefully. Many of the opportunities above require some sort of organizational restructuring or growth, processes that are always difficult, and require a lot of planning. Some even represent rethinking the purpose of the organization, which may become a different organization in the process. In becoming larger or more accepted, for instance, an organization may forget its roots or its guiding principles, and lose much of its effectiveness.
Other threats may come unaccompanied by opportunity. Your organization may experience difficulty finding — and keeping — ongoing funding and other resources, including competent staff; sustaining continued effort in all areas of functioning (advertising, recruitment, public relations, programming, evaluation, etc.); dealing with controversy; and addressing antagonism from individuals, other groups, or the community.
Applying SWOT analysis to all the areas your organization has to deal with makes it easier both to anticipate and prepare for the negative, and to remember to identify and build on the positive.
Other facets of the planning process
Some specific areas that long-range strategic planning needs to address at regular intervals:
- Reexamining the organization’s vision, guiding principles, and mission statement. Are they still relevant to what the organization does, and are they still what the organization believes? Do they need to be restated or redefined?
- Reexamining the goals of the organization. Are they still relevant to the needs they were originally meant to address? Are they consistent with the vision and mission statement?
- Reexamining the current strategies of the organization for meeting those goals. Are current methods effective? Are they consistent with the organization’s vision, mission statement, and guiding principles? Are they feasible? Do they play well in the community? Are they inclusive and respectful? Are they ethical?
KEEPING AT IT
The single most important thing to understand about maintaining quality performance — or maintaining an organization, for that matter — is that you can never stop working at it. No effort at maintaining quality will work any longer than it is applied. No matter how institutionalized dynamism becomes, no matter how good your planning process is, they take constant care.
THE FOURTEEN POINTS
Deming used the key elements listed above in “Basic principles of TQM” to define the “Fourteen Points,” fourteen things that he felt businesses needed to do in order to achieve quality performance.
- Create constancy of purpose toward the improvement of products and services in order to become competitive, stay in business, and provide jobs.
- Adopt the new philosophy. Management must learn that it is a new economic age and awaken to the challenge, learn their responsibilities, and take on leadership for change.
- Stop depending on inspection to achieve quality. Build in quality from the start.
- Stop awarding contracts on the basis of low bids.
- Continuously improve the system of production and services to enhance quality and productivity, and thus constantly to reduce costs.
- Institute training on the job.
- Institute leadership. The purpose of leadership should be to help people and technology work better.
- Drive out fear so that everyone may work effectively.
- Break down barriers between departments so that people can work as a team.
- Eliminate slogans, exhortations, and targets for the work force. They create adversarial relationships.
- Eliminate quotas and management by objectives. Substitute leadership.
- Remove barriers that rob employees of their pride of workmanship.
- Institute a vigorous program of education and self improvement.
- Make the transformation everyone’s job and put everyone to work on it.
Achieving and maintaining quality performance is important to the target population, to funders, and to the community.
Using some TQM principles and, specifically, the Deming Cycle (PLAN, DO, CHECK, ACT, ANALYZE) can be helpful in getting to a high level of quality and continuing to improve.
In general, achieving and maintaining quality is a result of:
- Careful planning
- Program or initiative development that adheres to that planning
- Implementation that takes quality into account
- Constant reevaluation of implementation and of the organization
- An assumption of the dynamic character of the organization, and a willingness to change continually in striving for a better way to accomplish goals
- Keeping at it indefinitely